Commonwealth v. Coffey

121 Mass. 66, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 286
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 121 Mass. 66 (Commonwealth v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Coffey, 121 Mass. 66, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 286 (Mass. 1876).

Opinion

By the Court.

The judge below ruled, as requested by the defendants and admitted by the district attorney at the trial, that the father was entitled to the custody of his daughter, and submitted the case to the jury under instructions not excepted to.

The only matter of exception is to the refusal to rule that the evidence was insufficient in law to warrant a conviction. But the jury, upon the evidence stated in the bill, might well find the defendants guilty, upon the ground that they used force which was excessive and unjustifiable in the sick condition of the daughter, or upon the ground that them acts were not done in the exercise or support of the rightful authority of the father, but in the execution of a scheme of the defendant Coffey, and under his direction and control only. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Dorvil
32 N.E.3d 861 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2015)
Commonwealth v. Rubeck
833 N.E.2d 650 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 Mass. 66, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-coffey-mass-1876.