Commonwealth v. Coderre

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Commonwealth v. Coderre

277 N.E.2d 677, 360 Mass. 869, 1971 Mass. LEXIS 1047

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedDecember 30, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 277 N.E.2d 677 (Commonwealth v. Coderre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Coderre, 277 N.E.2d 677, 360 Mass. 869, 1971 Mass. LEXIS 1047 (Mass. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

These are appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, in which the only assignment of error argued before us relates to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the indictment charging him with rape. Specifically, he argues that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of penetration. Commonwealth v. McCan, 277 Mass. 199, 203. We disagree. The victim testified that the defendant while pointing a knife at her forced her to have “relations” with him. Also, the crime was committed in the presence of two witnesses, one of whom testified that she saw the defendant “on top of” the victim; the other testified that she saw the defendant have “intercourse” with the victim. Moreover, a vaginal examination of the victim shortly after the crime revealed the presence of spermatozoa. On this evidence, the jury were warranted in finding, as they impliedly did, that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim. Commonwealth v. D’Ambrosio, 318 Mass. 779. Other evidence in the record warranted the conclusion that the intercourse was accomplished by the defendant with the use of force and without the victim’s consent. The judge was therefore correct in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These are appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, in which the only assignment of error argued before us relates to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the indictment charging him with rape. Specifically, he argues that there was not sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of penetration. Commonwealth v. McCan, 277 Mass. 199, 203. We disagree. The victim testified that the defendant while pointing a knife at her forced her to have “relations” with him. Also, the crime was committed in the presence of two witnesses, one of whom testified that she saw the defendant “on top of” the victim; the other testified that she saw the defendant have “intercourse” with the victim. Moreover, a vaginal examination of the victim shortly after the crime revealed the presence of spermatozoa. On this evidence, the jury were warranted in finding, as they impliedly did, that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim. Commonwealth v. D’Ambrosio, 318 Mass. 779. Other evidence in the record warranted the conclusion that the intercourse was accomplished by the defendant with the use of force and without the victim’s consent. The judge was therefore correct in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

Judgments affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 N.E.2d 677, 360 Mass. 869, 1971 Mass. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-coderre-mass-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack