Commonwealth v. Coaxum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Coaxum

31 A.3d 288, 612 Pa. 478, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2670

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 2, 2011·No. 401 EAL 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as phrased by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by holding that the evidence was insufficient to sustain [petitioner]^ gun possession convictions where she ordered her accomplice to shoot the victim?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as phrased by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by holding that the evidence was insufficient to sustain [petitioner]^ gun possession convictions where she ordered her accomplice to shoot the victim?

Commonwealth v. Coaxum, 31 A.3d 288, 612 Pa. 478, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2670 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

31 A.3d 288 (Commonwealth v. Coaxum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related