Commonwealth v. Coaxum

31 A.3d 288, 612 Pa. 478, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2670
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 2, 2011
Docket401 EAL 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.3d 288 (Commonwealth v. Coaxum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Coaxum, 31 A.3d 288, 612 Pa. 478, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2670 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as phrased by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by holding that the evidence was insufficient to sustain [petitioner]^ gun possession convictions where she ordered her accomplice to shoot the victim?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zodoq El v. Harlow
31 A.3d 288 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.3d 288, 612 Pa. 478, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-coaxum-pa-2011.