Commonwealth v. Clark

378 A.2d 386, 249 Pa. Super. 459, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2522
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 6, 1977·No. Appeal, No. 1566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to read his requested instruction on the issue of alibi. Appellant’s co-defendant raised an identical claim in Commonwealth v. Van Wright, 249 Pa.Super. 451, 378 A.2d 382 (1977), in which we reversed the judgment of sentence and granted the co-defendant a new trial. Therefore, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Van Wright, we reverse appellant’s judgment of sentence and grant a new trial.

Judgment of sentence vacated and new trial granted.

CERCONE, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Clark, 378 A.2d 386, 249 Pa. Super. 459, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2522 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

378 A.2d 386 (Commonwealth v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Van Wright
378 A.2d 382 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)