Commonwealth v. Christine
86 A.3d 831, 624 Pa. 505, 2014 WL 714771, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 515
This text of 86 A.3d 831 (Commonwealth v. Christine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Christine, 86 A.3d 831, 624 Pa. 505, 2014 WL 714771, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 515 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:
(1) Is a conviction for assault, which occurs subsequent to the incident at issue in a criminal trial, admissible to prove the allegedly violent propensities of the victim, where self-defense is asserted and where there is an issue raised as to who was the aggressor?
(2) Did the [t]rial [cjourt commit error of law or abuse its discretion when it permitted the Commonwealth to admit a “shank” as physical evidence, as well as testimony regarding said shank, in the course of the jury trial in the instant matter?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Christine, J., Aplt.
125 A.3d 394 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 A.3d 831, 624 Pa. 505, 2014 WL 714771, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-christine-pa-2014.