Commonwealth v. Childs, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Childs, C.

176 A.3d 232

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 6, 2017·No. 436 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Was the [PCRA] court in error for dismissing [Petitioner’s] Petition for Post Conviction Relief averring that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to remarks of the assistant district attorney during her closing argument wherein she repeatedly called [Petitioner] a liar?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Was the [PCRA] court in error for dismissing [Petitioner’s] Petition for Post Conviction Relief averring that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to remarks of the assistant district attorney during her closing argument wherein she repeatedly called [Petitioner] a liar?

Commonwealth v. Childs, C., 176 A.3d 232 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

176 A.3d 232 (Commonwealth v. Childs, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.