Commonwealth v. Chiappini

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Chiappini

715 A.2d 428

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 14, 1998

DocketNo. 363 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.1997

StatusPublished

This text of 715 A.2d 428 (Commonwealth v. Chiappini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Chiappini, 715 A.2d 428 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14 th day of August 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to:

1) Whether the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Denise Chiappini, who was Petitioner’s wife at the time of events to which she testified.

2) 'Whether Petitioner should have received credit towards his sentence for the 518 days that he served in an electronic monitoring/home confinement program, which was a mandatory condition of his bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14 th day of August 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to:

1) Whether the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Denise Chiappini, who was Petitioner’s wife at the time of events to which she testified.

2) 'Whether Petitioner should have received credit towards his sentence for the 518 days that he served in an electronic monitoring/home confinement program, which was a mandatory condition of his bail.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 A.2d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-chiappini-pa-1998.