Commonwealth v. Charity Hospital
48 A. 906, 199 Pa. 119, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 568
Opinion
The act of 1897 is not before us and we express no opinion upon it. On the construction of the act of 1899 the majority of the court affirm the decree on the opinion of the learned judge below, and the bill is dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Charity Hospital, 48 A. 906, 199 Pa. 119, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 1901).
48 A. 906 (Commonwealth v. Charity Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co.
174 A. 353 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Ray
1931 OK 735 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Tibbs-Dorsey Mfg. Co. v. State Industrial Com.
1931 OK 53 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Commonwealth v. Asturino
6 Pa. D. & C. 537 (Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1924)
Marcy v. Board of Commissioners of Seminole County
1914 OK 583 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Brown v. Patterson
124 S.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Brewer v. Rust
1908 OK 61 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)