Commonwealth v. Cephas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Cephas

266 A.2d 475, 439 Pa. 608, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 735

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 2, 1970

DocketAppeal, No. 224

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.2d 475 (Commonwealth v. Cephas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Cephas, 266 A.2d 475, 439 Pa. 608, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 735 (Pa. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Harold Cephas, appellant, was found guilty on charges of forgery, making and uttering a worthless check, fraudulent conversion and conspiracy. His post-trial motions were denied, and on direct appeal the Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 735, 255 A. 2d 922 (1969). We granted allocatur. We have received a pro se brief from appellant, and we remand for the appointment of counsel or an acknowledgment from appellant that he does [610]*610not desire assistance of counsel in taking and presenting this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Harold Cephas, appellant, was found guilty on charges of forgery, making and uttering a worthless check, fraudulent conversion and conspiracy. His post-trial motions were denied, and on direct appeal the Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 735, 255 A. 2d 922 (1969). We granted allocatur. We have received a pro se brief from appellant, and we remand for the appointment of counsel or an acknowledgment from appellant that he does [610]*610not desire assistance of counsel in taking and presenting this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.2d 475, 439 Pa. 608, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cephas-pa-1970.