Commonwealth v. Cater

834 A.2d 504
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 21, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 834 A.2d 504 (Commonwealth v. Cater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Cater, 834 A.2d 504 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2003, the order of the Superior Court is reversed and the case is remanded to the PCRA court to consider whether appellant [505]*505is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon his appellate counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 825 A.2d 630 (Pa. 2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Liebel
825 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
834 A.2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cater-pa-2003.