Commonwealth v. Casey, D.
This text of Commonwealth v. Casey, D. (Commonwealth v. Casey, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 626 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : BRENDAN PATRICK YOUNG, : : Respondent :
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 627 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DANIEL CASEY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
1) Did the Superior Court err in extending Commonwealth v. Walker to require dismissal where the notice of appeal showed multiple docket numbers but there was only one case and one docket, with one defendant, one suppression ruling, and one set of facts and issues?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Casey, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-casey-d-pa-2021.