Commonwealth v. Carney
This text of 111 N.E.3d 1112 (Commonwealth v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On April 29, 2003, the defendant pleaded guilty to charges of assault and battery on a police officer, pursuant to G. L. c. 265, § 13D ; malicious destruction of property, pursuant to G. L. c. 266, § 127 ; threats to commit a crime, pursuant to G. L. c. 275, § 2 ; and disorderly conduct, pursuant to G. L. c. 272, § 53. The defendant filed motions to withdraw his guilty pleas on three occasions -- in 2009, 2016, and 2017 -- each of which was denied. In the instant appeal from the order denying the 2017 motion, the defendant maintains that there was an insufficient factual basis for his guilty plea to the crime of assault and battery on a police officer. We affirm.
Discussion. Passing on the question whether the defendant waived his present argument by failing to raise it in his first motion, the defendant's appeal falters because he has not shown that the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea was "an abuse of discretion that produces a manifestly unjust result." Commonwealth v. Pingaro,
Order entered November 7, 2016, denying motion to withdraw guilty plea affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 N.E.3d 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-carney-massappct-2018.