Commonwealth v. Carlton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Carlton

676 A.2d 1191, 544 Pa. 435, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1234

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Carlton. Read the opinion of the Court — 549 Pa. 174 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 5, 1996·Published

Opinion

[1192]*1192 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of JUNE, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the police officers’ execution of the search warrant did not violate the “knock and announce” rule.

It is further ordered that this case be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Donald Carlton, 690 E.D. Allocatur Dkt.1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1192]*1192 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of JUNE, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the police officers’ execution of the search warrant did not violate the “knock and announce” rule.

It is further ordered that this case be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Donald Carlton, 690 E.D. Allocatur Dkt.1995.

Commonwealth v. Carlton, 676 A.2d 1191, 544 Pa. 435, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1234 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

676 A.2d 1191 (Commonwealth v. Carlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.