Commonwealth v. Carino

659 A.2d 556, 540 Pa. 571, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2490
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 14, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 1995, the petition for allowance of appeal and application for permission to supplement the petition are granted, the order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for consideration of the merits of the appeal. See Commonwealth v. Huff, — Pa. -, 658 A.2d 1340 (1995).

CASTILLE, J., dissents on the basis of his dissent in Commonwealth v. Huff, supra. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Carino, 659 A.2d 556, 540 Pa. 571, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2490 (Pa. 1995).

659 A.2d 556 (Commonwealth v. Carino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Borger
682 A.2d 329 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)