Commonwealth v. Carino

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Carino

659 A.2d 556, 540 Pa. 571, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2490

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 14, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 659 A.2d 556 (Commonwealth v. Carino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Carino, 659 A.2d 556, 540 Pa. 571, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2490 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 1995, the petition for allowance of appeal and application for permission to supplement the petition are granted, the order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for consideration of the merits of the appeal. See Commonwealth v. Huff, — Pa. -, 658 A.2d 1340 (1995).

CASTILLE, J., dissents on the basis of his dissent in Commonwealth v. Huff, supra. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 1995, the petition for allowance of appeal and application for permission to supplement the petition are granted, the order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for consideration of the merits of the appeal. See Commonwealth v. Huff, — Pa. -, 658 A.2d 1340 (1995).

CASTILLE, J., dissents on the basis of his dissent in Commonwealth v. Huff, supra. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 A.2d 556, 540 Pa. 571, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 2490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-carino-pa-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack