Commonwealth v. Canty, T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 6, 2016·No. 44 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 44 EM 2016 :

Respondent :

: :

v. :

: :

TYREE CANTY, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc Pending Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED.

Counsel has filed a motion for appointment of a new attorney in the common pleas

court. See Commonwealth v. Canty, CP-51-CR-0003406-2009 (motion filed

3/23/2016). The 30-day filing period for an allocatur petition shall commence upon

disposition of that motion.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the presiding common

pleas court judge and the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Canty, T., (Pa. 2016).

Commonwealth v. Canty, T. (Commonwealth v. Canty, T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.