Commonwealth v. Canty, T.
This text of Commonwealth v. Canty, T. (Commonwealth v. Canty, T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 44 EM 2016 : Respondent : : : v. : : : TYREE CANTY, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for
Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc Pending Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED.
Counsel has filed a motion for appointment of a new attorney in the common pleas
court. See Commonwealth v. Canty, CP-51-CR-0003406-2009 (motion filed
3/23/2016). The 30-day filing period for an allocatur petition shall commence upon
disposition of that motion.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the presiding common
pleas court judge and the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of
Philadelphia County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Canty, T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-canty-t-pa-2016.