Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA

996 A.2d 1062, 606 Pa. 227, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1369

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 23, 2010

Docket429 MAL 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 996 A.2d 1062 (Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA, 996 A.2d 1062, 606 Pa. 227, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1369 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The question, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Should the question of whether a defendant who confronts multiple individuals, yet commits a single theft, be convicted of multiple counts of Robbery be reviewed by this Honorable Court, and if so reviewed, should [Petitioner’s] sentences in this case merge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The question, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Should the question of whether a defendant who confronts multiple individuals, yet commits a single theft, be convicted of multiple counts of Robbery be reviewed by this Honorable Court, and if so reviewed, should [Petitioner’s] sentences in this case merge?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

996 A.2d 1062, 606 Pa. 227, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cangiarella-pa-2010.