Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA

996 A.2d 1062, 606 Pa. 227, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1369

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2010·No. 429 MAL 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The question, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Should the question of whether a defendant who confronts multiple individuals, yet commits a single theft, be convicted of multiple counts of Robbery be reviewed by this Honorable Court, and if so reviewed, should [Petitioner’s] sentences in this case merge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The question, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Should the question of whether a defendant who confronts multiple individuals, yet commits a single theft, be convicted of multiple counts of Robbery be reviewed by this Honorable Court, and if so reviewed, should [Petitioner’s] sentences in this case merge?

Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA, 996 A.2d 1062, 606 Pa. 227, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1369 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

996 A.2d 1062 (Commonwealth v. CANGIARELLA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.