Commonwealth v. Campbell

406 S.W.2d 730, 1966 Ky. LEXIS 214
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 30, 1966·Published

Opinion

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The Commonwealth seeks a certification of the law concerning whether count one of an indictment against appellee states a violation of KRS 436.360. Count one avers:

“That during the year of 1965, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, the above named defendant conducted, managed, or promoted the business of Filter Queen of Louisville, Inc., a lottery or gift enterprise.”

Upon an indictment in which the averment is indistinguishable from that herein presented the identical question was answered in Commonwealth v. Allen, Ky., 404 S.W.2d 464. In that case we certified that such an averment in an indictment does properly state the offense denounced by KRS 436.360. The former certification is dispositive of the instant query.

The law is so certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Campbell, 406 S.W.2d 730, 1966 Ky. LEXIS 214 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966).

406 S.W.2d 730 (Commonwealth v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Allen
404 S.W.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1966)