Commonwealth v. Calloway

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Calloway

993 A.2d 871, 605 Pa. 664, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 869

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 26, 2010

DocketAppeal No. 334 MAL 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 993 A.2d 871 (Commonwealth v. Calloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Calloway, 993 A.2d 871, 605 Pa. 664, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 869 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

993 A.2d 871, 605 Pa. 664, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-calloway-pa-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack