Commonwealth v. Cabey

193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 12, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 193 A.2d 663 (Commonwealth v. Cabey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Cabey, 193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434 (Pa. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

201 Pa. Superior Ct. 433 (1963)

Commonwealth
v.
Cabey, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 11, 1963.
September 12, 1963.

Before RHODES, P.J., WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (ERVIN, J., absent).

*434 Sara Duffy, for appellant.

A. Joseph Rieffel, Assistant District Attorney, with him Arlen Specter, Assistant District Attorney, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, September 12, 1963:

The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cabey-pasuperct-1963.