Commonwealth v. Cabey
This text of 193 A.2d 663 (Commonwealth v. Cabey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Commonwealth
v.
Cabey, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Before RHODES, P.J., WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (ERVIN, J., absent).
*434 Sara Duffy, for appellant.
A. Joseph Rieffel, Assistant District Attorney, with him Arlen Specter, Assistant District Attorney, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, September 12, 1963:
The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cabey-pasuperct-1963.