Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Cabey

Commonwealth v. Cabey

193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 12, 1963·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

201 Pa. Superior Ct. 433 (1963)

Commonwealth
v.
Cabey, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 11, 1963.
September 12, 1963.

Before RHODES, P.J., WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (ERVIN, J., absent).

*434 Sara Duffy, for appellant.

A. Joseph Rieffel, Assistant District Attorney, with him Arlen Specter, Assistant District Attorney, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, September 12, 1963:

The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Cabey, 193 A.2d 663, 201 Pa. Super. 433, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 434 (Pa. Ct. App. 1963).

193 A.2d 663 (Commonwealth v. Cabey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States of America Ex Rel. William Cabey H-2519 v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Philadelphia
431 F.2d 839 (Third Circuit, 1970)
United States ex rel. Cabey v. Mazurkiewicz
312 F. Supp. 11 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)