Commonwealth v. Bylsma of Martin, Esq.
This text of Commonwealth v. Bylsma of Martin, Esq. (Commonwealth v. Bylsma of Martin, Esq.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 119 MM 2023 : : v. : : : JAKE DOUGLAS BYLSMA : : : PETITION OF: AARON DIEGO MARTIN, : ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of November , 2023, in consideration of the Application
to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of
Adams County for that court to determine whether to permit Attorney Aaron Diego Martin
to withdraw. If present counsel is granted leave to withdraw, the court is to resolve
whether to allow Jake Douglas Bylsma to proceed pro se.
The Court of Common Pleas of Adams County is DIRECTED to enter its order on
remand within 90 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Bylsma of Martin, Esq., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bylsma-of-martin-esq-pa-2023.