Commonwealth v. Butler

396 A.2d 775, 262 Pa. Super. 320, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 Pa. Super. 486
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 29, 1978·No. No. 2243·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 1978, the petition to withdraw is denied. Counsel for appellant is directed either (1) to file an amended request for leave to withdraw that meets in all respects the requirements of notice to the appellant, see Commonwealth v. Liska, 252 Pa.Super. 103, 380 A.2d 1303, 1306 (1977), and to file a withdrawal brief that meets the description in Commonwealth v. Greer, 455 Pa. 106, 108-09, 314 A.2d 513, 514-15 (1974), or (2) to proceed with the appeal by filing an advocate’s brief on the merits. In either case, counsel is to file a new brief and request, or new brief alone, within thirty (30) days, or risk sanctions.

SPAETH, J., files a dissenting statement, in which VAN der VOORT, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Butler, 396 A.2d 775, 262 Pa. Super. 320, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4246 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

396 A.2d 775 (Commonwealth v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Liska
380 A.2d 1303 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Greer
314 A.2d 513 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Patrick
383 A.2d 935 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)