Commonwealth v. Burgett
136 Mass. 450, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 136
Opinion
There was evidence for the jury that the defendant intended that the whiskey should be at the risk of the company until delivered to the buyer at Hyde Park; and that it was the understanding of the defendant, that until, and unless, the [456]*456whiskey was so delivered, the order was not filled, and the company was not entitled to retain the money sent. This is evidence of a sale in Hyde Park. No error appears in the exceptions. Commonwealth v. Greenfield, 121 Mass. 40. Suit v. Woodhall, 113 Mass. 391.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Burgett, 136 Mass. 450, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 136 (Mass. 1884).
136 Mass. 450 (Commonwealth v. Burgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. . Ben Vonde Co.
107 S.E. 139 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Barry v. State
118 N.E. 309 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1918)
Merrill v. State
93 N.E. 857 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
State v. Kind
75 A. 438 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)
Northcutt v. State
34 S.W. 946 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Commonwealth v. Hugo
41 N.E. 123 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)