Commonwealth v. Burgett
This text of 136 Mass. 450 (Commonwealth v. Burgett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence for the jury that the defendant intended that the whiskey should be at the risk of the company until delivered to the buyer at Hyde Park; and that it was the understanding of the defendant, that until, and unless, the [456]*456whiskey was so delivered, the order was not filled, and the company was not entitled to retain the money sent. This is evidence of a sale in Hyde Park. No error appears in the exceptions. Commonwealth v. Greenfield, 121 Mass. 40. Suit v. Woodhall, 113 Mass. 391.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 Mass. 450, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-burgett-mass-1884.