Commonwealth v. Bruno, (No. 3)
This text of 188 A. 326 (Commonwealth v. Bruno, (No. 3)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion, by
Joseph J. Bruno, appellant here, was tried on three charges of murder for the alleged killing of Dominick Perna, John Galosky and Andrew Kostishiun. A verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree was returned on each of the three indictments. Three sem tences of imprisonment for ten to twenty years were imposed. They are to be served consecutively. The appeals are from the judgments and sentences that followed the refusal of a new trial.
The operative facts here are to all intent the same as those set out in Commonwealth v. Bruno, 324 Pa. 236. *252 No assignments of error worthy of specific attention are raised here that were not disposed of there. All of them are accordingly overruled.
The judgments and sentences are affirmed and the record is remitted to the court below for the purpose of execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A. 326, 324 Pa. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bruno-no-3-pa-1936.