Commonwealth v. Bruder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Bruder

717 A.2d 1021

DecidedSeptember 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 717 A.2d 1021 (Commonwealth v. Bruder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Bruder, 717 A.2d 1021 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 1998 we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal limited to the following issue:

DID THE SUPERIOR COURT ERR IN AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF WITHOUT A HEARING, WHERE PLEA COUNSEL DID NOT FILE A DIRECT APPEAL ON PETITIONER’S BEHALF DESPITE PETITIONER’S ALLEGED REQUEST TO DO SO, THUS IMPLICATING PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A DIRECT APPEAL?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 1998 we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal limited to the following issue:

DID THE SUPERIOR COURT ERR IN AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF WITHOUT A HEARING, WHERE PLEA COUNSEL DID NOT FILE A DIRECT APPEAL ON PETITIONER’S BEHALF DESPITE PETITIONER’S ALLEGED REQUEST TO DO SO, THUS IMPLICATING PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A DIRECT APPEAL?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 A.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bruder-pa-1998.