Commonwealth v. Brown
This text of 401 A.2d 750 (Commonwealth v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On December 3, 1976, after two days of jury selection, appellant entered a plea of guilty to charges of murder generally, robbery and criminal conspiracy. During the sentencing proceeding, appellant requested to withdraw his guilty pleas. The request was denied and appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of eight to twenty years for murder of the third degree, eight to twenty [244]*244years for robbery and three to ten years for criminal conspiracy. This appeal followed.
Appellant raises two issues: “1) Whether the trial court erred in not permitting the Appellant to testify as to his disagreements with his court-appointed counsel and his request for another court-appointed attorney; in effect, denying the Appellant effective legal representation”; and “2) Whether the trial court erred in not allowing the Appellant to withdraw his plea of guilty prior to sentencing.”
Our review of the record convinces us that these issues are without merit. See, Commonwealth v. Forbes, 450 Pa. 185, 299 A.2d 261 (1976).
Judgments of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 A.2d 750, 485 Pa. 242, 1979 Pa. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-brown-pa-1979.