Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet
This text of 177 A.3d 822 (Commonwealth v. Brooks, C., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner]' to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner’s] offense?
2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?
The judgment of sentence'is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.3d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-brooks-c-pet-pa-2018.