Commonwealth v. Brookins

613 A.2d 554, 531 Pa. 397, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 21, 1992·No. Appeal No. 30 E.D. Appeal Dkt., 1991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the Commonwealth filed a timely motion to vacate the erroneous sentence imposed by the trial court, appellant’s contention that the trial court was never accorded [398] an opportunity to correct the sentence is without merit. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa.-, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), the decision of the Superior Court vacating the sentence imposed by the trial court and remanding for application of the mandatory minimum sentencing statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a), is affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Brookins, 613 A.2d 554, 531 Pa. 397, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456 (Pa. 1992).

613 A.2d 554 (Commonwealth v. Brookins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Corporan
613 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)