Commonwealth v. Brookins

613 A.2d 554, 531 Pa. 397, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 21, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 30 E.D. Appeal Dkt., 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 613 A.2d 554 (Commonwealth v. Brookins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Brookins, 613 A.2d 554, 531 Pa. 397, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the Commonwealth filed a timely motion to vacate the erroneous sentence imposed by the trial court, appellant’s contention that the trial court was never accorded [398]*398an opportunity to correct the sentence is without merit. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa.-, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), the decision of the Superior Court vacating the sentence imposed by the trial court and remanding for application of the mandatory minimum sentencing statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a), is affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Corporan
613 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 A.2d 554, 531 Pa. 397, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-brookins-pa-1992.