Commonwealth v. Brock

15 A.3d 428
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 10, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.3d 428 (Commonwealth v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Brock, 15 A.3d 428 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of March 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the trial court err in dismissing the serious charges against defendant under Rule 600, where he waived his Rule 600 claim by failing to file a motion to dismiss, and by voluntarily failing to appear for the March 8, 2005 trial listing?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.3d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-brock-pa-2011.