Commonwealth v. Britton, C., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Britton, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Britton, C., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 56 WM 2014 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHARLES DENNIS BRITTON, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. While counsel did not demonstrate that the
failure to file a timely Petition for Allowance of Appeal was the result of anything other
than counsel’s negligence, Petitioner is entitled to a counsel-filed Petition for Allowance
of Appeal. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122; Commonwealth v. Liebel, 825 A.2d 630 (Pa. 2003).
Counsel is DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days of this
order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Britton, C., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-britton-c-pet-pa-2014.