Commonwealth v. Bricker
This text of 540 A.2d 932 (Commonwealth v. Bricker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 1988, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of sentence is vacated and the matter is remanded to that court for consideration on the merits of Petitioner’s claim that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Commonwealth witness Charles Rossi relating to Petitioner’s criminal history in light of [69]*69Commonwealth v. Bricker, 506 Pa. 571, 487 A.2d 346 (1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
540 A.2d 932, 518 Pa. 68, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bricker-pa-1988.