Commonwealth v. Bricker

540 A.2d 932, 518 Pa. 68, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 6, 1988
DocketPetition No. 262 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 540 A.2d 932 (Commonwealth v. Bricker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Bricker, 540 A.2d 932, 518 Pa. 68, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 129 (Pa. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 1988, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of sentence is vacated and the matter is remanded to that court for consideration on the merits of Petitioner’s claim that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Commonwealth witness Charles Rossi relating to Petitioner’s criminal history in light of [69]*69Commonwealth v. Bricker, 506 Pa. 571, 487 A.2d 346 (1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Bricker
548 A.2d 604 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 A.2d 932, 518 Pa. 68, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bricker-pa-1988.