Commonwealth v. Bricker, D.
177 A.3d 823
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the sentencing court impose a harsh, severe, and manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence in light of the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident?
The judgment of sentence is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, - Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Bricker, D., 177 A.3d 823 (Pa. 2018).
177 A.3d 823 (Commonwealth v. Bricker, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.
164 A.3d 1189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)