Commonwealth v. Bres, S., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Bres, S., Pet (Commonwealth v. Bres, S., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 231 WAL 2019 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : SHAWN KEVIN BRES, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the Honorable Donna Jo McDaniel correctly treated the Petitioner’s Amended Post-Conviction Relief Act Petition and/or Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, which challenged the constitutionality of Subchapter I of the Pennsylvania Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (which was recently enacted into law on February 21, 2018), as an untimely petition filed pursuant to the Post- Conviction Relief Act?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Bres, S., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bres-s-pet-pa-2020.