Commonwealth v. Brenner

982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 141, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2292
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 27, 2009
DocketPetition No. 11 MAL 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 1221 (Commonwealth v. Brenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Brenner, 982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 141, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2292 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

[142]*142 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to issue a, rephrased for clarity: Whether the Superior Court erred by finding petitioner failed to preserve issues for appeal. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, pursuant to Commonwealth v. Gravely, 970 A.2d 1137 (Pa.2009) (creating prospective rule appellant seeking extension to file Rule 1925(b) statement must do so by written application with trial court), and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration on the merits. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Gravely
970 A.2d 1137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 141, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-brenner-pa-2009.