Commonwealth v. Bragg, G.
143 A.3d 890, 636 Pa. 394, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1703
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 4, 2016·No. 67 EAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Should the mandatory minimum sentence imposed by the trial court under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714 be vacated, and this matter remanded for a new sentencing hearing, due to the fact that § 9714 is unconstitutional as currently drafted?
This matter is consolidated with Commonwealth v. Macklin, 288 MAL 2015 and Commonwealth v. Sachette, 973 MAL 2015 for oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Bragg, G., 143 A.3d 890, 636 Pa. 394, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1703 (Pa. 2016).
143 A.3d 890 (Commonwealth v. Bragg, G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Com. v. Jackson, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Hall, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Reich, V.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Walls, L.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Mosley, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Elliott, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Commonwealth v. Diaz
152 A.3d 1040 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Commonwealth v. Tooks
151 A.3d 666 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)