Commonwealth v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Bradford

12 A.3d 288

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 12, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of January 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in ruling that the trial court was correct in determining that the Commonwealth did [289] not act with due diligence in bringing respondent to trial?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of January 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in ruling that the trial court was correct in determining that the Commonwealth did [289] not act with due diligence in bringing respondent to trial?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Bradford, 12 A.3d 288 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

12 A.3d 288 (Commonwealth v. Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related