Commonwealth v. Borzelleca
942 A.2d 894, 596 Pa. 261, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 85
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 14, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 690 MAL 2007
StatusPublished
This text of 942 A.2d 894 (Commonwealth v. Borzelleca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Borzelleca, 942 A.2d 894, 596 Pa. 261, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 85 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that “occurred within the same judicial district” as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?
Petitioner’s Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 110
Pennsylvania § 110
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
942 A.2d 894, 596 Pa. 261, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-borzelleca-pa-2008.