Commonwealth v. Borzelleca

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Borzelleca

942 A.2d 894, 596 Pa. 261, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 85

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 14, 2008·No. Appeal No. 690 MAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that “occurred within the same judicial district” as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?

Petitioner’s Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that “occurred within the same judicial district” as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?

Petitioner’s Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Commonwealth v. Borzelleca, 942 A.2d 894, 596 Pa. 261, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 85 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

942 A.2d 894 (Commonwealth v. Borzelleca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related