Commonwealth v. Boone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Boone

319 A.2d 679, 456 Pa. 312, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 529

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 24, 1974

DocketAppeal, No. 223

StatusPublished

This text of 319 A.2d 679 (Commonwealth v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Boone, 319 A.2d 679, 456 Pa. 312, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 529 (Pa. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellant asserts as error on this appeal (1) the refusal of his motion in arrest of judgment because of insufficiency of evidence, (2) the admission in evidence of testimony of a threat made by appellant and directed to the victim of the homicide some six weeks before it occurred, and (3) prejudicial remarks made by the district attorney in his summation to the jury. Our examination of each of these issues satisfies us that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appellant asserts as error on this appeal (1) the refusal of his motion in arrest of judgment because of insufficiency of evidence, (2) the admission in evidence of testimony of a threat made by appellant and directed to the victim of the homicide some six weeks before it occurred, and (3) prejudicial remarks made by the district attorney in his summation to the jury. Our examination of each of these issues satisfies us that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 A.2d 679, 456 Pa. 312, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-boone-pa-1974.