Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Booker

Commonwealth v. Booker

982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 142, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2327
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 27, 2009
DocketPetition No. 233 EAL 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 1221 (Commonwealth v. Booker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Booker, 982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 142, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2327 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of October 2009, the Respondent’s Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED. The trial court is directed to appoint new counsel to represent the Respondent. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for action [143]*143consistent with our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Liston, 977 A.2d 1089 (Pa.2009).

Justice GREENSPAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Liston
977 A.2d 1089 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 1221, 603 Pa. 142, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-booker-pa-2009.