Commonwealth v. Bonded Motors of Stoughton, Inc.

1 Mass. Supp. 477
CourtMassachusetts Superior Court
DecidedJune 3, 1980
DocketNo.120439
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mass. Supp. 477 (Commonwealth v. Bonded Motors of Stoughton, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Bonded Motors of Stoughton, Inc., 1 Mass. Supp. 477 (Mass. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

FINAL JUDGMENT

It appears to the Court that the defendants have consented, in the [478]*478Consent attached hereto, to the entry of this Final Judgment; and the Court finds both subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and sufficient basis herein for the entry of judgement.

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The defendant Bonded Motorjs of Stoughton, Inc., d/b/a Bonded Dodge, (hereinafter “Bonded”) is in civil contempt of the order of this Court entered June 2, 1977, and more specifically;

a) On seven occasions Bonded advertised motor vehicles for sale when those offers were not bona fide efforts to sell the advertised motor vehicles, in violation of paragraph 1 of the order of this Court;

b) On one occasion Bonded offered to sell a motor vehicle in violation of paragraph 2 of the order of this Court;

c) On four occasions Bonded represented that specific repairs had been made to a motor vehicle when, in fact, those repairs had not been made, in violation of paragraph 4 of the order of this Court;

d) Bonded repeatedly provided to consumer purchasers a written warranty which includes language which attempts to limit or avoid Bonded’s implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, in violation of paragraph 5 of the order of this Court; and

e) On two occasions Bonded failed to deliver motor vehicles at the express price included in its contracts unless the purchasers also agreed to purchase a “Preferred Customer Service Contract”, in violation of paragraph 7 of the order of this Court.

2. Bonded shall pay a civil penalty of $3,000 for the violations of the order of the Court entered June 2, 1977, to the Commonwealth to be distributed by the Attorney General in his discretion to consumers injured by Bonded’s Contumacious conduct. Said penalty shall be paid by Bonded not later than fourteen days after the entry of this judgement to the Attorney General or his designee. If the total amount is not disbursed to consumers of the Commonwealth, the balance shall escheat to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

3. Bonded, its officers, agents, servants, and employees are permanently restrained and enjoined as follows:

a) From advertising offers to sell particular motor vehicles when the offers are not bona fide efforts to sell such advertised motor vehicles. This restraint includes, but is not limited to, advertising offers to sell particular motor vehicles and then:

(1) Refusing to show, demonstrate or sell the vehicle offered in accordance with the terms the offer; or

(2) Disparaging by acts or words the advertised vehicle; or

(3) Showing or demonstrating a vehicle which is defective, or unusable for normal highway driving; or

(4) Failing to disclose in the advertisement the specific quantity of the advertised motor vehicles which are available for sale; or

(5) Failing to have available at Bonded’s usual place of business, at the time the advertisement is submitted for publication, the motor vehicle or motor vehicles advertised for sale in the quantity advertised and in the condition advertised, provided that, when an advertised vehicle is sold or becomes otherwise unavailable for sale, Bonded cancels further advertisements insofar as the periodical where the advertisement has been submitted permits cancellation.

This paragraph of the injunction shall not, however, be deemed to apply where the offer to sell states, or otherwise gives notice, that an advertised motor vehicle is not presently available in stock but must bfe ordered by Bonded.

b) From advertising offers to sell [479]*479particular motor vehicles which are known to Bonded to be unusable for normal highway driving or which, in the exercise of reasonable care should be known to Bonded to be unusable for normal highway driving.

c) From failing to indicate in writing on the bill of sale that a motor vehicle has been used as a police car, taxi cab, rental vehicle or leased vehicle, if Bonded knows that the motor vehicle has been so used, or if Bonded, in the exercise of reasonable care, should know that the motor vehicle has been so used.

d) From representing that specific repairs have been made to a motor vehicle when those repairs have in fact not been made or have not been completed.

e) From providing to any customer who purchases a motor vehicle from Bonded primarily for personal, family, or household use any written document which includes language which attempts to limit or avoid Bonded’s implied warranty of merchantability or implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, including but not limited to the following language:

There are no warranties whatsoever, expressed or implied, with respect to the car or truck purchased by me beyond the description thereof, including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose (which warranties are hereby expressly disclaimed).

f) From providing to any customer who purchases a motor vehicle from Bonded primarily for personal, family, or household use any written warranty which fails to include the following notice in at least ten-point type or its equivalent, “THIS WARRANTY IS IN ADDITION TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.”

g) From failing to perform or fulfill promises or obligations arising under any express warranty or the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose in the sale of motor vehicles including, but not limited to:

(1) Failing to remedy promptly, at no cost to the purchaser, all defects, other than cosmetic defects, which the purchaser discovers within thirty (30) days of purchase; or

(2) Failing to refund promptly the full purchase price to the purchaser if Bonded is unable or unwilling to remedy, at no charge, defects, other than cosmetic defects, which the * purchaser discovers within thirty (30) days of purchase, except where Bonded possesses facts on which to base a reasonable' belief that the defects occurred through the fault of the purchaser; or

(3) Failing to remedy promptly, at no charge to the customer, any repairs performed by Bonded on the customer’s vehicle which were not performed in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with accepted trade standards.

The term “promptly” as used herein shall mean within ten days from the date the vehicle is delivered to Bonded, except where Bonded can show by clear and convincing evidence that a longer period of time is justified.

h) From failing to deliver motor vehicles pursuant to the express terms of Bonded’s contracts unless the motor vehicle is stolen, lost, destroyed, or is otherwise unavailable through no willfull act of Bonded.

i) From failing to deliver motor vehicles at the express price included in Bonded’s contracts of sale, except that:

(1) The price of a new vehicle may be increased in an amount equal to any price increase imposed by the manufacturer which is the result of a law or regulation of the United States or of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts which either requires the addition of new equipment to certain vehicles or [480]*480changes approved transportation costs or existing tax rates or, in the case of foreign-made vehicles, is due to a revaluation of the United States dollar; and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mass. Supp. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bonded-motors-of-stoughton-inc-masssuperct-1980.