Commonwealth v. Boelter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Boelter

344 A.2d 475, 463 Pa. 162, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 963

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 3, 1975·No. Appeal 7·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*163 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence. ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was denied a speedy trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*163 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence. ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was denied a speedy trial.

Commonwealth v. Boelter, 344 A.2d 475, 463 Pa. 162, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 963 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

344 A.2d 475 (Commonwealth v. Boelter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related