Commonwealth v. Boelter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Boelter

344 A.2d 475, 463 Pa. 162, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 963

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 3, 1975

DocketAppeal 7

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 344 A.2d 475 (Commonwealth v. Boelter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Boelter, 344 A.2d 475, 463 Pa. 162, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 963 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

*163 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence. ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was denied a speedy trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*163 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence. ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was denied a speedy trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 A.2d 475, 463 Pa. 162, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-boelter-pa-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack