Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet (Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 59 WM 2015
Respondent
v.
HARRY A. BOATNER JR.,
Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Extraordinary
Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (stating
that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to
forward the filing to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-boatner-h-pet-pa-2015.