Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 59 WM 2015
Respondent
v.
HARRY A. BOATNER JR.,
Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Extraordinary
Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (stating
that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to
forward the filing to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet, (Pa. 2015).
Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet (Commonwealth v. Boatner, H., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)