Commonwealth v. Blevins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Blevins

331 A.2d 180, 459 Pa. 652, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 596

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 27, 1975·No. 211·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*653 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Appellant, William Ray Blevins, failed to raise the alleged assignments of error in his motions for new trial and arrest of judgment and, hence, is precluded from raising these questions on appeal. See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Clair, Pa., 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Goodman, 454 Pa. 358, 311 A.2d 652 (1973); and Commonwealth v. Myers, 439 Pa. 381, 384-385, 266 A.2d 756, 758 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*653 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Appellant, William Ray Blevins, failed to raise the alleged assignments of error in his motions for new trial and arrest of judgment and, hence, is precluded from raising these questions on appeal. See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Clair, Pa., 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Goodman, 454 Pa. 358, 311 A.2d 652 (1973); and Commonwealth v. Myers, 439 Pa. 381, 384-385, 266 A.2d 756, 758 (1970).

Commonwealth v. Blevins, 331 A.2d 180, 459 Pa. 652, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 596 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

331 A.2d 180 (Commonwealth v. Blevins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related