Commonwealth v. Blevins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Blevins

331 A.2d 180, 459 Pa. 652, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 596

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 27, 1975

Docket211

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 331 A.2d 180 (Commonwealth v. Blevins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Blevins, 331 A.2d 180, 459 Pa. 652, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 596 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

*653 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Appellant, William Ray Blevins, failed to raise the alleged assignments of error in his motions for new trial and arrest of judgment and, hence, is precluded from raising these questions on appeal. See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Clair, Pa., 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Goodman, 454 Pa. 358, 311 A.2d 652 (1973); and Commonwealth v. Myers, 439 Pa. 381, 384-385, 266 A.2d 756, 758 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*653 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of sentence affirmed. Appellant, William Ray Blevins, failed to raise the alleged assignments of error in his motions for new trial and arrest of judgment and, hence, is precluded from raising these questions on appeal. See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Clair, Pa., 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Goodman, 454 Pa. 358, 311 A.2d 652 (1973); and Commonwealth v. Myers, 439 Pa. 381, 384-385, 266 A.2d 756, 758 (1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 A.2d 180, 459 Pa. 652, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-blevins-pa-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack