Commonwealth v. Bishop
69 Pa. Super. 435, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103
Opinion
Opinion by
The defendant, after a verdict of guilty, moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. The court refused to arrest the judgment but granted a new trial. This set aside the verdict, and the proceedings in arrest of judgment fell with it. There is nothing from which to appeal: Lance v. Bonnell, 105 Pa. 46.
The appeal is quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Bishop, 69 Pa. Super. 435, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 103 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).
69 Pa. Super. 435 (Commonwealth v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth ex rel. Wallace v. Burke
84 A.2d 254 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Page
78 Pa. D. & C. 355 (Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1951)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wallace v. Burke, Warden
45 A.2d 871 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Kingsdorf v. Frank Gamburg, Inc.
24 A.2d 140 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Commonwealth v. Smith
5 A.2d 383 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Giles v. Ryan
176 A. 1 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)