Commonwealth v. Bishop

316 A.2d 622, 455 Pa. 464, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 652
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 25, 1974
DocketAppeal, No. 45
StatusPublished

This text of 316 A.2d 622 (Commonwealth v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Bishop, 316 A.2d 622, 455 Pa. 464, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 652 (Pa. 1974).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), and Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A.2d 201 (1968), counsel for the appellant is hereby directed to provide appellant with a copy of his brief and appellant shall be afforded an opportunity to file a supplement thereto. Upon compliance with this order, appellant’s present counsel may be permitted to withdraw and appellant shall be granted a reasonable time in which to notify the court that he elects to obtain new counsel to perfect his appeal or that he elects to file an appeal pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Baker
239 A.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 A.2d 622, 455 Pa. 464, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bishop-pa-1974.