Commonwealth v. Bertolette

101 Pa. Super. 334, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 327
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 10, 1931
DocketAppeals 84 and 85
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 101 Pa. Super. 334 (Commonwealth v. Bertolette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Bertolette, 101 Pa. Super. 334, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 327 (Pa. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The defendant was summarily convicted before a justice of the peace under the Act of April 7, 1927, P. L. 154, of violating Section 1 of Article III of the Pules and Eegulations of the State Department of Health, approved April 4, 1923. That section of the rules provides as follows:

“No garbage, offal, pomace, dead animals, decaying matter or organic waste substance of any kind shall be thrown or deposited in any ravine, ditch, or gutter, on any street or highway; into any waters of the State, or be permitted to remain exposed upon the surface of the ground.”

The court of quarter sessions allowed an appeal and the case was submitted to the court without a jury on the testimony taken before the justice óf the peace. The court entered a judgment of not guilty on'the sole ground that the-rule was unreasonable'and therefore void because it exceeded the authority of the Department of Health. The Commonwealth appealed.

In Commonwealth v. Benson, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 10, we held that an entry of judgment of not guilty by the court of quarter sessions ó¿ an appeal from a summary conviction by a justice is an end of the case *336 and that no appeal lies. The anthorities upon the subject were there reviewed by our Brother Keller. See also, Com. v. Ahlgrim, 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 595.

The appeal is quashed.

A similar order is entered in Commonwealth v. Abernathy, No. 84, October Term, 1931.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Johnson
410 A.2d 894 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Lory
60 Pa. D. & C.2d 780 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Lodge No. 148 Loyal Order of Moose
149 A.2d 565 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Commonwealth v. Hollinger
84 A.2d 794 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Kerr
29 A.2d 340 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Commonwealth v. Obenreder
19 A.2d 497 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Commonwealth v. Teman
3 A.2d 960 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Pittsburgh v. Ruffner
4 A.2d 224 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Commonwealth v. Wanamaker
194 A. 681 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Commonwealth v. Pahlman
179 A. 910 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Peacock
179 A. 907 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Pa. Super. 334, 1931 Pa. Super. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bertolette-pasuperct-1931.