Commonwealth v. Berryhill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Berryhill

180 A.3d 365

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketNo. 439 EAL 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 180 A.3d 365 (Commonwealth v. Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Berryhill, 180 A.3d 365 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.3d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-berryhill-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack