Commonwealth v. Berryhill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Berryhill

180 A.3d 365

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 30, 2018·No. No. 439 EAL 2017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?

Commonwealth v. Berryhill, 180 A.3d 365 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

180 A.3d 365 (Commonwealth v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related