Commonwealth v. Bergdoll
55 Pa. Super. 186, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 340
Opinion
After due consideration we are all of opinion that the substantial questions raised by the assignments of error have been correctly and adequately answered in the opinion of the learned trial judge overruling the defendant’s motion‘for a new trial and in arrest of judgment.
The judgment is affirmed upon that opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Bergdoll, 55 Pa. Super. 186, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 340 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).
55 Pa. Super. 186 (Commonwealth v. Bergdoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Pierce
309 A.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Polis v. Commonwealth
57 Pa. D. & C.2d 190 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Commonwealth v. Phillips
132 A.2d 733 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Comber
97 A.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Commonwealth v. Dever
44 Pa. D. & C. 34 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1941)
Commonwealth v. Jones
5 A.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Commonwealth v. Garrity
32 Pa. D. & C. 99 (Erie County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1938)
Com. of Pa. v. Donnelly
172 A. 190 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.
171 A. 900 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Commonwealth v. Zito
20 Pa. D. & C. 16 (Schuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1933)
Commonwealth v. Temple
39 S.W.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Gasparovic v. Reed
5 Pa. D. & C. 531 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Miller
4 Pa. D. & C. 335 (Philadelphia County Court of Oyer and Terminer, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Gayton
69 Pa. Super. 513 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
People v. Hopper
169 P. 152 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1917)