Commonwealth v. Bennaim

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Bennaim

92 A.3d 807

DecidedMay 28, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.3d 807 (Commonwealth v. Bennaim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Bennaim, 92 A.3d 807 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is: Did the Superior Court err in determining that the trial court could unilaterally shorten the terms of a 3 year old bargained for plea agreement in order for [Respondent] to avoid the collateral consequences of SORNA, ignoring established precedent and denying the Commonwealth the benefit of its plea agreement?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is: Did the Superior Court err in determining that the trial court could unilaterally shorten the terms of a 3 year old bargained for plea agreement in order for [Respondent] to avoid the collateral consequences of SORNA, ignoring established precedent and denying the Commonwealth the benefit of its plea agreement?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.3d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bennaim-pa-2014.