Commonwealth v. Benge
This text of 7 Ky. Op. 408 (Commonwealth v. Benge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The appellee, Benge, was. certainly not bound to incriminate himself when testifying before the county judge; but wholly failing to avail himself of that immunity at the time, we think it was competent for the commonwealth afterwards, in this case, to prove any statements he may have made before the judge conducting the examination to sustain the charge in the indictment; and the court erred in rejecting such evidence.
But we regard the trial and judgment as such as to exempt the defendant from further jeopardy for the same offense, and the judgment cannot therefore be reversed. Civil Code, Sec. 333.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ky. Op. 408, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-benge-kyctapp-1873.