Commonwealth v. Bellan
This text of 321 A.2d 657 (Commonwealth v. Bellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The appellant, Ronald J. Bellan, was convicted by a jury of voluntary manslaughter. Post-verdict motions [204]*204were denied and a three to six year sentence imposed. This appeal followed in which the appellant claims that he was prejudiced by (1) the trial court’s questioning and comments during the trial (2) the holding of one night session and (3) the trial court’s review of the evidence and instructions to the jury. A review of the record does not sustain the appellant’s contention that prejudice resulted from any of the above claims. Cf. Commonwealth v. Leamer, 449 Pa. 76, 295 A.2d 272 (1972); Commonwealth v. Zapata, 447 Pa. 322, 290 A.2d 114 (1972); Commonwealth v. Watts, 358 Pa. 92, 56 A.2d 81 (1948). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the issues raised are without merit.
The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 A.2d 657, 458 Pa. 203, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bellan-pa-1974.